Welcome visitor you can login or create an account.
ADL is a leading provider of Distance Learning, Home Study & Online Courses
Payment Options
Online Courses

* E-Mail:

Contact Us
First Name:

Email Address:

Phone Number:


If the EU Referendum campaigns were essays, they would fail

in Study Tips, Lifestyle Education , Writing and Journalism on June 22, 2016 . 0 Comments.

If you’re living in the UK right now, you are probably being bombarded with letters, billboards and news broadcasts about the EU referendum. Most of these publications will try to convince you that there is only one good argument. In academic writing terms, we call this a biased, unbalanced approach.

There are reasonable arguments behind both sides of the debate, but they are being hidden under a deep layer of cynical and sophisticated attempts to manipulate your feelings and devalue the other side. Today I want to showcase some of these invalid arguments.


Appeal to ethos (Leave)

A long time ago in Greece, a bright young thing called Aristotle made an observation. People use three different modes of persuasion when they argue. Some people appeal directly to your emotions and ideals (pathos), some people appeal to how important they are (ethos), and some (very, very few) try to use a logical argument (logos). Only the third approach is considered legitimate for critical thinking.

The Leave campaign is the worst offender on this front. The UKIP party has been making appeals to pathos all the way through.


(UKIP, 2015)


The idea of this image, for example, is to stir your national pride and patriotism. There is no way to argue against this image because it is just stating an ideal, not making any kind of logical argument.


Straw man argument (Stay)

Another reason the campaigns would fail as essays, is that they exaggerate and simplify the arguments of the opposite campaign. The “Stay” campaign is the worst for this. Here is an example:


(Operation Black Vote, 2016)


This poster attempts to manipulate people of colour into believing that the Leave campaign is a racist campaign run by racists. Compare the two figures – which one is more sympathetic?

This approach is probably a response to the appeal to pathos (above). It is just as invalid. Depicting the Leave campaign as purely racist is an over-simplification. This straw man argument is just as illegitimate as the appeal to pathos.


Ad hominem attack (Stay & Leave)

An ad hominem attack is an attack made against a person rather than their argument. We can see that the straw man image above by the Stay campaign is also an ad hominem attack, but the Leave campaign is no better:


(@VoteLeaveEU, 2016)


This image is an ad hominem attack because it attacks Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany. It depicts her as a Nazi general, conquering countries. The image does not make an argument about why the UK should leave, it just attacks a person who thinks the UK should stay.


Have you been paying attention?

Here’s a final test. What kind of invalid argument is this, and why? It might fit more than one category.


(The Mirror, 2016)


Politicians, businesses and people around us manipulate us like this all the time. The discipline of detecting and defending against invalid arguments is called Critical Thinking. ADL offers a short University Preparation course which is perfect for developing your critical thinking and academic writing skills.



Go the Distance

Get 3% OFF on your purchase!

Like, Share, Tweet or Follow us and get Discount!


Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

*E-mail: (Not Published)
   Website: (Site url with http://)

Disclaimer: Every attempt is made to ensure all information from the academy is accurate and that the student has attained the competencies taught in a course, at the point of their assessment. Beyond this point, the graduate is responsible to maintain their acquired competencies, and apply acquired knowledge and skills in a way which is appropriate to the unique characteristics of each application. This will release the academy from any liability, action and claims of whatsoever nature in connection with, or arising from any such information, instruction or advice, given by any student or ex-student, whether directions given during the course are followed or not.